Loading…
The Compliance-First Curriculum Crosswalk

Meet the 2026 HHS Nutrition Mandate with a faculty-governed, audit-ready crosswalk.

For deans and curriculum leaders at the 53 HHS-committed medical schools. A live analytical mirror of your curriculum against the 71 HHS competencies, triaging alignment into three strategic tiers — Verified Coverage, Reflection-Addressable, and Strategic Gaps — backed by verbatim syllabi evidence and closed with reflective evaluation driven by the Reflective Nutrition Suite AI Engine and curated ANA content.

Free for your first crosswalk · No credit card · Access reviewed within 1 business day

HHS Medical Education Nutrition Competency Framework · January 2026 · In partnership with American Nutrition Association · Powered by Learner+
71HHS competencies
10Curriculum domains
53U.S. schools committed
40hCompliance target

What you walk away with

Artifacts built deterministically from your curriculum and reviewed by our team — defensible to a dean, an accreditor, or a grant officer, anchored by faculty judgment.

01 · Institutional Crosswalk

Know exactly where you stand against the HHS 40-hour target.

A live crosswalk of your curriculum against the 71 HHS competencies, triaged into three strategic tiers — Verified Coverage, Reflection-Addressable, and Strategic Gaps — broken down by domain and evidence base. Every match is anchored by a verbatim evidence excerpt from your source material; your faculty's accept, edit, or reject judgments form the Institutional System of Record — not the model's.

D1
D2
D3
D4
D5
02 · Plan & Launch

Close the compliance gap — without claiming new lecture hours from faculty.

The math is anchored to the HHS 40-hour target, not the full 191.5h framework. Reflection-Addressable gaps close through reflective evaluation driven by the Reflective Nutrition Suite AI Engine — low-lift pedagogical interventions where students demonstrate competency on what they already learn (10–15 min per learner, no new lecture time). Strategic Gaps match to industry-vetted ANA supplemental content by topic.

Three closure modes — Recommended (proportional split), Reflection-heavy (minimize new content investment), or Content-heavy (lean on vetted ANA material) — let you pick the institution's pedagogical philosophy in one click. Reflection prompts themselves are informed by your curriculum and ANA-vetted content, so even pure-reflection paths leverage the latest evidence.

Launch a cohort in one click: class code, tracking link, LMS embed, faculty 1-pager — ready to drop into Canvas, Blackboard, or MedHub.

Your closure plan

Close 8.5h of your 12.5h compliance gap with reflection alone — no new lecture hours required. Add 2 ANA courses for the remaining 4.0h.

via reflection8.5h
via ANA content4.0h
Beyond compliance: 47 more competencies in the framework available to plan as you go.
03 · Stakeholder Reports

Audit-ready evidence, pre-built for the people who need to read them.

Three packages: Dean & Curriculum Committee, Accreditor, Grant officer. Each report is requested by you, then reviewed and published by the Learner+ team — never auto-generated, never inflated. Reports cite framework version + primary-source PDF, surface your HHS Foundational 40 / high-evidence / JAMA 2024 alignment, and ship as both a downloadable snapshot and a 30-day signed share link the recipient opens without an account — the "receipts" required for site visits and accreditation cycles.

Grant Deliverable
Accreditor
Curriculum Coverage & Compliance Plan
Demo University · UME · For internal Curriculum Committee review
14.5h
Covered
40h
Target
8 wk
To comply

How it works

Four tabs, one institutional crosswalk. Auto-saved as you go.

1

Curriculum

Drop in syllabi, learning objectives, course atlases. The platform proposes competency matches with verbatim evidence excerpts and confidence scores; faculty accept, edit, or reject each one.

~25 minutes
2

Coverage

The honest mirror of what your curriculum delivers today: hours covered against the 40h target, gaps triaged into Reflection-Addressable and Strategic Gaps requiring content.

read-only
3

Plan & Launch

One headline, one bar, one button. Approve the recommended closure path, name a cohort, launch it (class code, tracking link, faculty 1-pager) ready to deploy.

~5 minutes
4

Reports

Request a Dean, Accreditor, or Grant report. Our team reviews and publishes a vetted snapshot you can download or share via signed link — never auto-generated.

~1 business day

Faculty-Led Governance. Audit-Ready Evidence.

The Reflective Nutrition Suite AI Engine assists scholarly judgment — it does not replace it. To ensure accreditation integrity, every competency match is anchored by a verbatim evidence excerpt from your source material. The platform serves as your labor-saving assistant, but your faculty remains the final arbiter.

  • Verified Coverage — syllabi-backed evidence of existing alignment. Maintain & monitor.
  • Reflection-Addressable — low-lift pedagogical interventions to bridge minor gaps. Bridge & refine.
  • Strategic Gaps — areas for vetted ANA supplemental content. Augment & integrate.
  • The Institutional System of Record is built exclusively on your faculty's accept, edit, or reject judgments — providing the receipts required for site visits and accreditation audits.

What you can count on

We are honest about what we know, what we don't yet know, and what your institution remains accountable for. No marketing claims you'd need to defend.

  • Built on the HHS Medical Education Nutrition Competency Framework (January 2026 — 71 competencies, 10 domains).
  • Reflective evaluation runs in-suite via the Reflective Nutrition Suite AI Engine. Built in partnership with the American Nutrition Association (ANA) for curated content and Learner+ as the CME credentialing partner.
  • Self-attestation outputs — your institution remains the Institutional System of Record. We never claim authority we don't have.
  • Reports reviewed by the Learner+ team before publication. Never auto-generated, never inflated, never fabricated.
  • No PHI accepted. ANA-aligned content recommendations are metadata-only — we never reproduce or redistribute content.
  • The HHS framework is a voluntary commitment as of March 2026. We track LCME (closing 2026) and ACGME (effective July 2027) for codification updates.

Common questions

Does this require us to add curriculum hours?

For most competencies, no. Plan anchors to the HHS 40-hour target and balances Reflection-Addressable gaps with Strategic Gaps requiring content — most close through 10–15 minute structured reflections (low-lift pedagogical interventions) where students demonstrate competency on what they already learn. Strategic Gaps (foundational biochemistry, etc.) match to curated ANA supplemental content rather than asking faculty to build new material. You can flip Plan into Reflection-heavy or Content-heavy mode in one click depending on the institution's pedagogical philosophy.

Does pure reflection actually leverage the latest evidence?

Yes. Reflection prompts on the student side draw on both your curriculum (the matched excerpts from your uploaded materials) and ANA-vetted content summaries — the Reflective Nutrition Suite AI Engine surfaces both as it runs the reflection. So a "reflection-only" path still grounds learners in current evidence, not just personal opinion.

How long does a first crosswalk take?

30 minutes from upload to a launched cohort. Stakeholder reports come back within 1 business day after request. Auto-saved throughout — return when you have time.

What if a proposed competency match is off?

Every match is editable. Your faculty's accept, edit, or reject decisions become the Institutional System of Record. The platform only proposes — faculty judgment is the final arbiter.

What does the HHS framework mean for accreditation?

It's a voluntary commitment as of March 2026 — not yet an LCME or ACGME requirement. Every report we publish includes that disclosure verbatim.

Who sees our curriculum data?

Stored in Firestore, partitioned per institution. The Learner+ team accesses it only during report review. We never accept PHI.

Can I share reports with people who don't have an account?

Yes. Every published report can generate a 30-day read-only share link your dean, accreditor, or grant officer can open without signing in.

What if HHS revises the framework?

We update the underlying data and you can re-run your crosswalk. Your previous reports remain immutable snapshots — what you sent stays what you sent.

Ready to walk into your next accreditation cycle prepared?

A faculty-governed system of record that transforms syllabi into an audit-ready crosswalk of the 71 HHS Nutrition Competencies.

Free for your first crosswalk. Reports reviewed by our team within 1 business day.

Your crosswalks

A faculty-governed, audit-ready crosswalk of your curriculum against the HHS Medical Education Nutrition Competency Framework — and the path forward.

How it works

  1. Curriculum. Drop in your materials. Faculty review the proposed competency matches against the 71 HHS competencies; accept, edit, or reject each one.
  2. Coverage. See where you stand against the 40-hour target — Verified Coverage, Reflection-Addressable, and Strategic Gaps.
  3. Plan & Launch. Approve the recommended closure path, name a cohort, launch it ready for your LMS.
  4. Reports. Request a Dean, Accreditor, or Grant report; our team reviews and publishes a vetted snapshot.

Typical first run: ~30 minutes. Auto-saved as you go.

Start a new crosswalk

Just your institution name to start. You can change anything later.

Advanced (program type, framework, target hours)
Framework note. The HHS Medical Education Nutrition Competency Framework is a voluntary commitment by 53 U.S. medical schools as of March 2026. It is not currently codified in LCME or ACGME requirements. This tool produces self-attestation outputs; the institution remains the Institutional System of Record.
← All playbooks